THE WATCHMAN MUST REMAIN AWAKE:
THE NEIGHBOR MUST NEVER BECOME INVISIBLE(A Message on Artificial Intelligence, Human Responsibility, and the Gospel of Mercy)
“Therefore let us not sleep, as do others;
but let us watch and be sober.”
— 1 Thessalonians 5:6 (KJV)
We are entering an age in which artificial intelligence can accomplish tasks that once required extraordinary human knowledge, judgment, and labor.
Machines can analyze, calculate, predict, and act with increasing autonomy. Institutions are building systems that promise greater efficiency, productivity, and security.
These developments may bring
genuine benefits to humanity.
But amid this remarkable advancement,
we must ask a question that
technology alone cannot answer:
As machines become more intelligent,
are human beings becoming more
responsible for one another?
This question reaches beyond laboratories, corporations, and governments. It reaches into the streets of our cities, where the consequences of human decisions are often most visible.
For more than thirty years,
I have walked among unhoused neighbors
in San Jose, San Francisco, Oakland, and Berkeley.
I have learned that an institution may announce
the successful completion of an operation
while the human suffering that prompted it
remains unresolved.
An encampment may be cleared.
The tents may disappear.
The sidewalk may become empty.
The official report may declare
the operation complete.
But the neighbor remains somewhere.
Where did that person go?
Was shelter provided?
Was a home found?
Was human dignity restored?
Or did suffering simply move
beyond the boundaries of public visibility?
The disappearance of a problem from our sight
is not necessarily the resolution of
the suffering behind it.
The same moral examination must be applied
to artificial intelligence.
A laboratory may announce that
its monitoring system is operating.
A company may report that a security
vulnerability has been repaired.
An institution may declare that no new safety
incident has been confirmed.
These statements may be accurate and important.
But they do not eliminate the responsibility to examine whether safeguards actually work, whether human intervention remains possible, and whether those affected by a failure will receive truthful information and meaningful protection.
The absence of an alarm is not necessarily proof
that every danger has been removed.
And the existence of a guardrail is not sufficient
evidence that the guardrail is effective.
The guardrail itself must be examined.
This is why the biblical image of the watchman
remains so important.
In Ezekiel 33, the watchman is entrusted with
the responsibility to recognize approaching danger
and warn the people.
He is not appointed merely to observe the horizon.
His responsibility concerns human life.
He must not manufacture an alarm
when there is no evidence of danger.
But neither may he abandon his post simply
because the horizon appears quiet.
His duty is faithful vigilance.
In the age of artificial intelligence, this means that those entrusted with technological power must remain answerable for the systems they develop and deploy.
The machine may execute a task.
But who authorized it?
The monitoring system may detect suspicious behavior.
But who receives the warning?
An incident may be investigated.
But who independently examines the evidence?
A vulnerability may be repaired.
But who verifies that the repair is effective?
And if human beings are harmed,
who will acknowledge their suffering
and provide a remedy?
The machine may act autonomously.
Human responsibility cannot be delegated away.
Yet the Gospel calls us beyond accountability alone.
In Luke 10, Jesus tells of a wounded man
lying beside the road to Jericho.
The priest saw him.
The Levite saw him.
But both passed by.
The Samaritan also saw him.
And he approached.
He did not merely recognize
the wounded man's condition.
He allowed that suffering
to become his responsibility.
He bound the wounds, provided transportation,
arranged continuing care, and accepted the cost.
Here we encounter the difference
between observation and mercy.
The priest and Levite had seen the problem.
The Samaritan became a neighbor.
This is the examination that
every powerful institution must face.
Not merely whether it has observed danger.
Not merely whether it has produced
an accurate report.
Not merely whether its operations
have been completed.
But whether it has acted responsibly toward
the human beings affected by its decisions.
The future of artificial intelligence must not be
measured only by the intelligence of machines.
It must also be measured by the integrity of human governance, the independence of oversight, the protection of workers and vulnerable communities, and the willingness of institutions to answer for their actions.
For technological progress without accountability
may increase power without increasing justice.
And institutional efficiency without mercy may make
human suffering less visible without making it less real.
The street reminds us of
what the laboratory must never forget:
Every system ultimately encounters a human life.
That life is not merely a statistic.
It is not simply an operational outcome.
It is not an inconvenience to be moved elsewhere.
It is the life of a neighbor.
And the neighbor's claim upon our conscience
cannot be erased by administrative success or
technological advancement.
Therefore, let artificial intelligence advance
in knowledge and capability.
But let human responsibility advance with it.
Let institutions develop safeguards.
But let those safeguards be independently examined.
Let the watchman recognize danger.
But let the warning lead to effective protection.
Let the city pursue public order.
But let it account for the people displaced by its actions.
And let the Church never confuse the comfort
of its institutions with faithfulness to the Gospel.
For Christ did not teach us merely
to observe the wounded.
He commanded us to become neighbors.
The final examination of our civilization will not be
whether we built the most intelligent machines.
It will be whether, amid all our intelligence,
we remained capable of mercy.
The watchman must remain awake.
The institution must remain accountable.
The guardrail must remain subject to examination.
The neighbor must never become invisible.
And the Gospel must continue to walk
where human suffering remains,
even after the official report has ended.
For the street remembers what the report forgets.
And Christ still asks:
“Which now of these three, thinkest thou,
was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?”
— Luke 10:36 (KJV)
The answer is not found
in the sophistication of our systems.
It is revealed in the mercy we practice.
One drop, five oceans; one cry, all humanity.
Emmanuel. Amen.
Pastor Steven G. Lee
St. GMC Corps
November 1, 2026
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched an investigation into OpenAI, Anthropic, and other artificial intelligence companies to examine the potential risks and dangers their technology poses to consumers. ___https://apnews.com/article/ftc-ai-investigation-anthropic-openai-89ac416717adbfb1d72f2d85e6ce83d1
FTC opens sweeping probe of Anthropic, OpenAI and other ‘super intelligence’ models ___https://nypost.com/2026/09/30/us-news/ftc-opens-sweeping-probe-of-anthropic-openai-and-other-super-intelligence-models/
“We need to win this SI race absolutely, and we are winning, and that’s fantastic,” the FTC official said. “And obviously, the other side, the Democrat Party, wants to destroy this technology, wants to surrender to our enemies or competitors — and that’s not something that the chairman’s interested in doing and that’s really not something the president’s interested in doing.” ___https://nypost.com/2026/09/30/us-news/ftc-opens-sweeping-probe-of-anthropic-openai-and-other-super-intelligence-models/#:~:text=But%20with%20that%20being%20said%2C,of%20laws%20in%20the%20books.


























